Savannah Guthrie’s shocking Amber Heard interview

Wednesday, today The second part aired exclusive An interview with Amber Heard-Her first televised sitting after the loss Explosive defamation trial against ex-husband Johnny Depp. Among the revelations, the 36-year-old claimed that she still “loved” Depp and denied wanting to “unvoke” him in her article at the center of the case.

During the Virginia trial that ended on June 1, jury ruled Which I heard tarnished Depp’s reputation when Washington Post published 2018 opinion Below her line she describes herself as a victim of domestic violence. Depp will receive $15 million in damages but will only receive $10.35 million due to the state’s cap on punitive damages. The jury also awarded Heard $2 million in damages after it was found that she had been defamed by Depp’s attorney, Adam Waldman, after Heard was accused of fabricating Depp in a “hoax.”

Despite winning that counter-suit, as well as a 2020 UK trial which determined that Depp misused Heard on 12 of 14 occasions, Heard has been largely portrayed as a liar in the public eye by Depp’s legion of obsessed fans. On social media and peers in hollywood Since she first alleges abuse in 2016. Similarly, Guthrie seemed skeptical about Aquaman Star throughout their solo lives, squeezing them over the recordings and other evidence provided by Team Depp while conveniently ignoring much of the recordings and other evidence provided by Heard. (The UK trial admitted much more evidence than the Virginia trial, which may help explain the different findings.)

In the The first half of the interview Aired on Monday, the news anchor questioned the actress about whether she had incited physical violence against Depp, questioned her about recordings that Heard claims were taken out of context, and told her that the First Amendment does not protect “lies.” At the conclusion of the interview, Guthrie seemed equally cynical and unhappy with Heard’s answers, telling the actress that her “hint” to Depp in her editorial was “unmistakable”. Heard also asked if she reported to TMZ to take pictures of her with a bruise when she filed a restraining order against Depp in 2016. For the most part, her questioning has not gone beyond information that was not actually brought up during the trial and his conflict with Heard, and completely lacks any insight into the abuse .

This is not the first time that a TV host has been insensitive to the topic of domestic violence or unaware of how survivors have adapted to violent situations with their partners. (Watch Barbara Walters’ interview with Rihanna after her accident with Chris Brown or Gayle King’s interview with FKA Twigs about her allegations against Shia LaBeouf.) However, viewers and journalists are still amazed at the fact that Guthrie was allowed to meet Heard in the first place.

The previous week, Guthrie revealed that her husband, Michael FeldmanI served as counsel to Depp’s legal team during the defamation trial immediately before proceeding to interview Depp’s attorneys Camille Vasquez and Benjamin Chiu. The interview went viral on Twitter and was met with a backlash from users alleging a conflict of interest.

The previous week, Guthrie revealed that her husband, Michael Feldman, acted as an advisor to Depp’s legal team during the defamation trial right before proceeding to interview Depp’s attorneys Camille Vasquez and Benjamin Chew.

“If I were the publicist or public relations officer at Amber Heard, I probably wouldn’t give my client the first major interview with someone who disclosed a conflict of interest,” Wrote One Twitter user.

“If Guthrie were to continue to do these interviews, today You need to make a bigger disclaimer that Guthrie, through her husband’s consulting party, has been personally enriched by Depp’s PR team,” Spread else. “The blatant conflict of interest is disrespect for Mrs. Heard.”

Press experts since then weighed On the controversy in inside workp . reportcalling Guthrie’s decision to meet with Depp’s lawyer “a bit of crazy” and highlighting the “financial stake”, while seeing how Feldman could be used again when Heard seeks to appeal a jury verdict.

While Heard or her representatives have yet to speak about the controversy, sources in the same article say that Heard and her team were aware of Guthrie’s connection to the case and were willing to move forward with the interview, which will end in an hour. date line Friday special broadcast.

While it is difficult to imagine the thought process behind arranging this interview and using it in a later editorial, it is possible that Heard, who was openly sympathetic to the jury and Depp’s supporters, wanted to show the audience that she could engage in polite conversation with someone closely related to her critics. However, it seems very strange and unwise that Heard’s team would allow their clients to undergo poor, unbiased questioning of Guthrie in her first major TV appearance after the trial, given the number of journalists who supposedly nibbled a bit to get exclusive with an actress.

Regardless of the intent or any knowledge Heard and her team received prior to the interview, the fact that Heard spent the majority of the session defending herself against widely publicized allegations once again is another tragedy for the actress, whose position was when it came to the upcoming Aquaman The sequel is still up in the air. Ultimately, the saddest part about fiasco is how completely avoidable it is.

.