A jury largely sided with Johnny Depp in the defamation trial with Amber Heard on Wednesday.
Experts told Insider that Heard lost because she wasn’t believable on the podium, not a big star.
“The jurors loved him, the audience loved him, everyone loved him on social media.”
Amber Heard Hours after the verdict was announced on Wednesday, experts told Insider that she lost the defamation case with Johnny Depp because it did not come to fruition as credible, and she lacks the star power of her ex-husband.
She took Depp Heard to court, claiming she had damaged his reputation by implying in a 2018 Washington Post op-ed that she had been a victim of domestic violence. Heard returned, and spent several days on the platform describing multiple incidents she said Depp physically and sexually assaulted her during their relationship.
On Wednesday, the jury in the case was largely biased deepfind it I heard Deb’s defamation On all three statements she sued, Depp was awarded a total of $15 million in damages. The jury also found that Depp had slandered Heard, but only in One of the three phrases They sued him, awarding Heard only $2 million in damages.
After the ruling, Insider spoke to two legal experts who collapsed as they believed Heard’s case had gone wrong.
Nehme Rahmani, president of West Coast Trial Lawyers, told Insider he felt Heard had a credibility issue.
“She lost because she lied and exaggerated a case that was all about love and credibility,” Rahmani said. “Depp was the most well-liked and credible witness. The jurors loved him, I love the audienceEveryone loves him on social media. And now Amber Heard is considered one of the most despised women in America. Rather than being the face of the #MeToo movement, she is the face of a false accusation.”
Rahmani said Heard appeared to lie about “things she didn’t need to lie about,” and it eventually cost her credibility. He specifically referred to how Heard confirmed that she had never leaked a video of one of her arguments with Depp to TMZ, or told the paparazzi that she would appear in court with a bruised face to issue a restraining order against Depp. Rahmani said it was also hard to believe Heard’s side of the story about why she had not fulfilled her pledge to donate her divorce settlement from Depp to a charity.
Rahmani said the photos of Heard’s injuries also did not match her graphic descriptions of Depp’s alleged beating.
“She told the jurors she thought Depp would kill her. Heard told the jurors that Depp kicked her so many times that she lost count. They talk about attempted murder or felony assault, and the photos, at best, support the misdemeanor beating,” Rahmani said.
“When someone lies and exaggerates them, jurors can completely disregard their testimony and they have done so and punished,” Rahmani added.
David Ring, a partner at Los Angeles-based law firm Taylor & Ring, agreed that Heard “lost credibility” during the trial.
“Some of the testimonies were not credible, and they seemed to be exaggerated and exaggerated,” he said.
But Ring also said the issue was probably down to who had the biggest star power, and it was clear that Depp won in that division.
“I think Johnny Depp is clearly the biggest star, and I don’t say it lightly,” Ring said. “I think the power of stars in the courtroom is very important.” “I think stars like that win the vast majority of the time and Johnny Depp is clearly a charismatic guy. And the jury overlooked all his flaws, really horrible behavior. They just put it all aside and said she vilified him and gave him a lot of money.”
“I don’t think she was as lovable as Johnny Depp,” Ring added. “I don’t go out of a party to say that either. The jury had to pick one or the other and they went for Johnny Depp. Johnny Depp won in the court of public opinion, he won in the courtroom, and he’s going to win going forward with this.”
Read the original article on from the inside