NBA Draft 2022: Why more men are coming back for another year of college rather than becoming a pro

In conversations with front office members over the past two months, I’ve asked a lot of questions about Chet Holmgren because he is the most amazing and polarizing player in the 2022 NBA draft.

Some might take it with overall pick #1. Others won’t use the top three pick on it. One CEO told me he sees Holmgren as a defensive player of the future for this year. Another told me he’s the kind of player teams that stick to the five-a-side attack will play.

Probably Both be true.

And it’s among the reasons why evaluating potential clients from positions and positions only is the most difficult task that executives face in every NBA draft. The great positions are still great – proof of that is that current MVP (Nikola Djokic) and current MVP runner-up (Joel Embiid) are already two centres. But for each position that exceeds reasonable expectations for the place in which it is chosen, there are three or four men who are classified as faults largely because they cannot do the things that modern centers are required to do.

Like a bouncer in space.

“Cooking on defense is the most important thing,” said one former front office executive. “They put you in pick-and-roll and kill you.”

This, by the way, is among the reasons why so many adults – men love Kentucky Oscar Chiboy, North Carolina Armando Bacot, Indiana Trace Jackson Davis and Perdio Zach Edey – They’ll be back in college next season when they’re all first-round picks as recently as 10 years ago. Their ability to make significant amounts of money legally through name, image, and likeness opportunities has certainly proven to be a magnet on campus. But the truth is, these players never chose between playing in the NBA next season or definitely playing in college. They mostly choose between Can They play in the NBA next season or definitely play in college, where they can probably make more money over the next year than they would have made as professionals.

“None of the men I named will be among the candidates in the first round,” said one evaluator. “Some of them wouldn’t even pick in the second round. Great college players sometimes just don’t fit in the NBA. We used to say that about the junior guards. Now we say that about the traditional seniors.”

Want more analysis of the 2022 NBA draft? Listen below and Subscribe to the Eye on College Basketball podcast Where we take an in-depth look at the top players heading to the next level.

The consensus assessment from scouts is as follows: Unless you can guard the space at least a little when defending and either run the edge or extend the floor when attacking, you probably don’t deserve to pick high in any draft.

So what do you do with Holmgren?

Skeptics Gonzaga Producer’s ability to become an NBA star is due to the fact that he only plays one position and is clearly not talented sideways enough to guard awesomely in the space – although several evaluators said they thought he would at least be “alright.” ” in that. Its slight frame is another obvious area of ​​concern. This is bad. But the good is so good that believers still see Holmgren worthy of consideration to be chosen first overall because they view him as an elite edge protector and a hugely ground-based who can play on the ocean and reliably make 3 pointers. In other words, Holmgren is so talented at some things that he could one day be the Defensive Player of the Year and All-Star Year of the Year, but too dubious in other ways that he can’t really become the two top picks he’s supposed to become. . And yes, there is a scenario, given the way the game has evolved for positions, where he is the best defensive player of the year and Defensive responsibility in certain situations because even three-time Defensive Player of the Year Rudy Gobert has sometimes proven to be a defensive liability in certain situations.

“Chet is one of the most unique possibilities I’ve ever seen,” said one evaluator. “If you take it first, you might regret it. But if you leave it, you might also regret it. …I think you can say that about a lot of possibilities. But I think that applies to Shit more than it’s among the five most predictable choices.”

traditional vs modern center

Once Holmgren is off the board, who knows when the next spot will be picked? Probably Galen Doreen, the only physical specimen to have come out Memphis. But, and that’s the problem for most adults these days, it’s more of a traditional center than a modern one in the sense that it’s unclear how effective it would be so far from the basket on either end of the court. If Doreen goes to the top ten, he’ll be closer to No. 10 than No. 1 even though he was previously No. 1 in his high school class.

He should have been born 20 years ago.

Decades ago, it was easy to pick two roles in the top five when he was formerly Illinois Actor Kofi Cockburn will compete to participate in the lottery. Now, Duren may not go into the top ten, and Cockburn, a traditional wild-status hub, runs the risk of not being selected despite being an all-American twice destroying rims.

why?

Because being a big rim destroyer isn’t as important as being a big guy who can move his feet and stay ahead of the smaller players in space, that’s why. Consequently, the massively produced and accomplished college products that were once touted as special prospects in the NBA are now often unpopular at the next level.

this amazing for the college game.

But don’t be fooled into thinking that VIPs like Chiboy, Paco, Jackson Davis and Eddie all go back to college just because they love it — or even for the money they have. This is definitely part of it. But these players mostly go back to college because the NBA game has changed so much for positions that they are no longer desirable the way they were in earlier eras. These guys come back mostly because as the sport has evolved, there hasn’t really been a great place for them to go.